Can I record a conversation and use it in court?

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard recorded themselves frequently throughout their relationship and the recordings were used in court.

As the Johnny Depp Vs. Amber Heard defamation trial starts coming to a close after over 20 days of witness testimonies and a nationwide media focus, many questions have arised from the public in regards to what we have seen presented in that Fairfax, Virginia courtroom.

At the heart of the trial are video and audio recordings presented as evidence from both sides to support their argument that one was violent with the other. Many people are wondering how these recordings are even allowed to be submitted into evidence since most of the time it is obvious that one party, either Depp or Heard, is not aware they are being recorded. Such as the infamous kitchen cabinet video where Amber Heard secretly records an angry Johnny Depp slamming the kitchen cabinet doors.

The answer is it depends on the state. Virginia, where this trial is taking place, is considered a “one-party consent” state meaning that the state makes it a crime to intercept or record any conversation unless one party to the conversation consents.

However, if the Depp Vs. Heard trial took place in Florida, it would look very different. Unlike Virginia, Florida is a “two-party consent” state meaning ALL parties to the conversation must give consent to being recorded. Thus,  in Florida it is illegal to secretly record another individual and it is considered a 3rd degree felony.

In a trial or court proceeding taking place in Florida or any other two-party consent state, recordings of any kind, like the explosive ones we’ve seen in the Johnny Depp Vs. Amber heard trial, would be considered inadmissible in court.

The trial taking place in Virginia seems to be a strategic move by Depps team for several reasons. Fairfax, Virginia is where the Washington post has their servers to post online editorials. Virginia also has weaker anti-SLAPP laws, which are set to protect the 1st amendment right of freedom of speech for those being sued for defamation. Both Heard and Depp live in California. However, California has a strong anti-SLAPP statute that would make it harder for Depp and his team to take this case to trial in front of a jury. To top it off, California is also a two-party consent state like Florida, meaning that all these recordings would also be considered inadmissible if the trial would have taken place in California where both parties live.

If you are ever in a situation where you have evidence you have obtained through your own means for your case, make sure to consult with a lawyer first to ensure that you are not doing more harm than good. 

By: Valentina Quintero

What Past Clients Say

default image

I met with several attorneys and I didn’t feel comfortable with any. Marcia walked me through the process and explained everything to me in detail. She was clear and very communicative throughout the ordeal. I recommend Marcia to anyone going through any type of criminal / legal matters.

Jose Martinez 5 March 4, 2019

default image

The Hansen Law Firm is a reliable law firm that I absolutely recommend. Marcia Hansen is an experienced, smart lawyer who uses a user friendly portal, which I can access anytime and see any updates regarding my case. She is also always available and quick to respond with any questions I may have.

Diego Fernandez 5 March 4, 2019

default image

Marcia was always available to assist me with my concerns. She laid out a strategy that resulted in to best possible outcome for our team.

kevin 5 March 4, 2019

default image

Marcia is a class act!!! I approached her when my cousin ran into trouble. He was facing 12 years of jail time. After her very thorough review of the case (expert witnesses, speaking with the prosecution, review of the evidence), he was released on time served with 2 years of house arrest. Needless to say, she is a true professional. Working with an experienced criminal defense attorney who has a heart is a rarity. She encompasses both. She is hardcore and sweet. I highly recommend her services. Praise God that my cousin has his life back on track and is making very sound decisions. He simply needed a second chance. Since then, Marcia has helped some of my clients who were erroneously being investigated. The client recently told me her fee was the best money he’s ever spent. He’s in the clear and his family can sleep at night. God bless her!!! She is the best.

S Berm 5 March 4, 2019

default image

Excellent experience with Marcia Hansen ,and the best results for our family ,we are so grateful for her work and kindness with us . I will recommend Marcia 100% .Thanks The Hansen Law Firm

KAB Badell 5 March 4, 2019


Plese fill out this form for an
FREE IMMEDIATE case evalution

Error: Contact form not found.